Important Employer Takeaways in Serrano v. Aerotek Decision

Not only can staffing agencies take a breath of relief with the recent California appellate decision in Serrano v. Aerotek, but all employers can benefit by the guidance this decision offers as it applies to meal break.

In Serrano, the employee plaintiff sued Aerotek, a global recruiting and staffing agency, and Bay Bread, the worksite employer, for failure to provide lawful meal periods.

RPNA Wins Victory for California QMEs In Settlement Agreement with the California Department of Workers’ Compensation

LOS ANGELES, CA, April 24, 2018—The California Division of Workers’ Compensation (DWC) reached settlements in the cases Dr. Howard, et al. v. DIR, DWC, Christine Baker, et al. (collectively “DWC”) and Dr. Botros, et al. v. DWC, agreeing to abandon its interpretation of billing rules which the agency wrongfully imposed starting in 2016 and used to deny doctors reappointment as qualified medical evaluators (QMEs) without due process.

Multiple QMEs in Northern and Southern California were reappointed as a result of these settlements. QMEs are physicians appointed by the state to provide independent medical reviews for disputed workers’ comp claims in California.

RPNA Prevails in Classification Case Against the WCIRB

Workers’ compensation insurance costs are directly tied to the classifications assigned to a business. An employer may be forced to pay more in premiums if the Workers Compensation Insurance Rating Bureau (WCIRB) or insurance carrier incorrectly assigns a more expensive classification.

While the Insurance Commissioner relies on the WCIRB to develop classification rules, RPNA recently succeeded in overturning two WCIRB classification assignments. And it did so after a hearing in front of an administrative law judge assigned by the Insurance Commissioner. 

Nick Roxborough Presents New Trends in Workers’ Comp Fraud at CWC Risk Conference

RPNA Partner Nick Roxborough is teaming up with several other dynamic speakers to share his expertise on the hot topic of workers’ compensation issues at the CWC Risk Conference on September 8, 2017. With breaking news involving recent indictments and precedential bad faith claims mishandling decisions, the expert panel will discuss the ripple effect of fraudulent activities that have had and will…

Drew Pomerance Focuses on Latest Wage & Hour and PAGA Developments at CAALA Annual Convention

RPNA Partner Drew Pomerance is joining the esteemed Employment Law Panel at CAALA’s Annual Las Vegas Convention on September 1, 2017 at the Wynn Hotel. The expert panel will present hot topics in employment law such as wrongful termination, gender and racial discrimination, equal pay, and whistleblower cases. Mr. Pomerance will be focusing on the latest developments in wage and hour law, including “off-duty” rest breaks, “on-call” meal periods, “call-in” scheduling, and class action waivers. He will also provide an update on PAGA claims and key legislation to watch. Mr. Pomerance is a regular speaker at the Consumer Attorneys Association of Los Angeles’ annual conference, touted as the largest convention of trial attorneys in the nation with over 2,800 attendees. For more information about the conference and to register, visit To learn more about Mr. Pomerance’s practice, click here.

Drew Pomerance Explores CA’s New Rule On Rest Breaks
 at Upcoming California HR Conference

RPNA Partner Drew Pomerance is scheduled to speak on August 29, 2017 at the California HR Conference (CAHR) in Long Beach. As one of the principal attorneys in the landmark Supreme Court decision in Augustus v. ABM, he will be exploring the impact of this ruling on rest break requirements and clarify employers’ obligations to employees. He will also offer the latest strategies employers can use to minimize their exposure to wage and hour litigation and protect themselves from class action suits, which can spiral out of control and result in a huge uninsured risk.

RPNA Wins $9.1 Million Suit on Behalf of Swiss Re

Decision shows employers and excess carriers are on same footing in TPA claims mishandling

RPNA won a significant claims mishandling case on behalf of Swiss Re, one of the world’s leading providers of reinsurance. After a three week trial, the superior court ruled that Sedgwick TPA Specialty Risk Services (SRS) committed seven distinct acts of negligence in handling a workers’ compensation claim that caused damages of nearly $6.8 million. Combined with prejudgment interest, the verdict totals in excess of $9.1 million.

“We litigated tenaciously for years,” explains RPNA partner Michael Adreani, who co-tried the case with RPNA senior partner Drew Pomerance. “It’s probably the most contentious litigation I’ve ever handled.”

CDI Ends Applied Underwriters’ ‘Bait-And-Switch’ Practices in California

Last week, the California Department of Insurance (CDI) reached a settlement agreement with Applied Underwriters, holding the Berkshire Hathaway subsidiary accountable and ending its bait-and-switch marketing tactics to sell its workers’ compensation products. Applied Underwriters has agreed to drop its petition to block the CDI’s enforcement action and come into compliance with well recognized state filing requirements.

Applied Underwriters’ products has spurred a wave of litigation and enforcement actions from regulators in multiple states, including Vermont, Wisconsin and New York. In the California cases Luxor Cabs v. Applied Underwriters Captive Risk Assurance Company—which was successfully handled by RPNA—and Shasta Linen Supply, Inc. v. Applied Underwriters, Inc., the courts ruled against Applied Underwriters, voiding its EquityComp Reinsurance Participation Agreement since it was not filed with the CDI and was therefore unenforceable.